Don’t Be Yourself—Be Someone a Little Nicer

June 23, 2026 · 7 min read

In an age saturated with self-help platitudes urging us to “be ourselves,” there arrives a small, elegant provocation that inverts the entire enterprise. “Don’t be yourself—be someone a little nicer” appears regularly on social media feeds, in email signatures, on mugs and t-shirts, often without attribution or fanfare. It surfaces in moments when someone recognizes the gap between who they are and who they aspire to be, and it lands with the force of a well-placed joke that contains an uncomfortable truth. The quote has become a kind of cultural shorthand for a very modern dilemma: the tension between radical self-acceptance and the obligation to grow, between embracing our authentic selves and acknowledging that our authentic selves might sometimes be irritating, selfish, or simply not our best selves. Its enduring appeal lies partly in its humor—it disarms us with a wink—but also in its subversive wisdom. Unlike the relentless positivity of conventional motivational rhetoric, this quote permits ambivalence. It does not demand that we transform completely, only that we make a small, achievable adjustment toward decency.

Mignon McLaughlin was an American journalist, magazine editor, and aphorist born in 1913, whose career spanned the middle decades of the twentieth century at a time when sharp, observational wit was valued as a serious literary form. She worked extensively in magazine publishing and established herself as a keen observer of the neuroses and peculiarities of American life—the small anxieties, social pretensions, and psychological contradictions that animated everyday existence. McLaughlin possessed what might be called a clinical humor; she approached human behavior not with sentimentality but with the wry affection of someone who understood that most of us are struggling beneath the surface of our public personas. In 1963, she published “The Neurotic’s Notebook,” a collection of aphorisms and observations that distilled her philosophy into bite-sized, memorable statements. Three years later, she followed with “The Second Neurotic’s Notebook,” which expanded on her earlier work and cemented her reputation as a kind of contemporary moralist—someone who could diagnose the human condition and prescribe corrective observations without ever losing her sense of humor or her fundamental compassion for human frailty.

According to extensive research by Quote Investigator, however, the attribution of “Don’t be yourself—be someone a little nicer” to McLaughlin remains uncertain, though plausible. The earliest documented instance of the quote appeared in May 1964 in a column called “Chatter” written by Leata McQuiston for the Hobbs Daily News-Sun in New Mexico. The remark was presented in quotation marks, indicating that McQuiston was citing it from elsewhere rather than claiming authorship. By October 1964, the same quip was circulating in “The Spokesman-Review” of Washington as a filler item in an advertisement section, again without attribution. This timing is significant: the quote was already in circulation as an anonymous joke by mid-1964. McLaughlin’s “The Second Neurotic’s Notebook” appeared in 1966, and it did include the line in a chapter on “Health, Happiness, and Self-Esteem,” alongside other pithy observations like “Always live up to your standards—by lowering them, if necessary.” It is entirely possible that McLaughlin originated the remark and it began circulating before appearing in McQuiston’s column, but Quote Investigator has found no definitive evidence to support this theory. What seems most likely is that the aphorism was part of the cultural conversation among writers and journalists in the early 1960s, that McLaughlin incorporated it into her published work, and that the quote subsequently became associated with her—though never formally attributed in the way major attributions usually are.

The philosophical terrain this quote inhabits is more complex than it initially appears. On one level, it is a straightforward repudiation of the “be yourself” imperative that had already begun to dominate American self-help literature and popular psychology by the 1960s. That imperative carried an implicit assumption: that your authentic self is worth being, that self-expression and self-acceptance are supreme goods, that conformity and self-improvement are forms of inauthenticity to be resisted. McLaughlin’s formulation—if indeed she formulated it—gently subverts this. It acknowledges that authenticity is not the highest value. Instead, it suggests something more modest and more human: we are all somewhat deficient in kindness, patience, and generosity. Rather than fighting this fact or achieving perfect self-actualization, why not simply aim to be slightly nicer than we naturally are? The quote’s genius lies in its humility. It does not ask for transformation; it asks only for a marginal improvement. It recognizes that people are flawed and that complete reformation is probably impossible, but it insists that even small movements toward decency matter. There is something almost Buddhist in this approach—the acknowledgment that we are imperfect, coupled with the commitment to reduce suffering through modest ethical effort.

Culturally, the quote has enjoyed a peculiar trajectory of attribution and reassignment. By 1997, it appeared in “Proverb Wit & Wisdom,” a collection compiled by Louis A. Berman, credited to McLaughlin. This publication helped to solidify the association between the quote and her name, at least in certain circles. However, attribution continued to shift. In 2015, a variant appeared in “The Republic” of Columbus, Indiana under the heading “Thought for the Day,” and this time it was attributed to Barbara Bush, the former First Lady. The variant read: “Be yourself. Well, maybe someone a little nicer.” This reassignment suggests that the quote’s wisdom felt sufficiently universal and noncontroversial that it could be claimed by figures of different generations and political positions. In the internet age, the quote has proliferated across social media platforms, often accompanied by no attribution whatsoever or occasionally misattributed to contemporary figures. The absence of clear provenance has actually worked in the quote’s favor; it has become folk wisdom, belonging to everyone and no one in particular. This democratization of authorship reflects how memorable aphorisms move through culture—they are borrowed, adapted, reused, and eventually absorbed into the collective consciousness as if they had always been there.

The practical wisdom embedded in this quote speaks directly to a contemporary problem: the exhaustion that comes from the pressure to be authentic while simultaneously improving oneself. In our current moment, we are bombarded with contradictory imperatives. Social media and therapeutic culture tell us to accept ourselves unconditionally, to celebrate our flaws, to be authentic and vulnerable. Yet these same platforms and this same culture tell us we should be constantly optimizing, improving, achieving, becoming better versions of ourselves. “Don’t be yourself—be someone a little nicer” offers a way out of this paradox. It permits us to accept ourselves as we are while also acknowledging that we have room to grow in specific, limited ways. It suggests that we need not undertake a wholesale reconstruction of identity to be worthwhile people. A small increment of kindness, a modicum of additional patience, a touch more generosity—these are within reach. The quote is practical because it is achievable. It does not demand that introverts become extroverts, that anxious people become confident, that naturally selfish people become saints. It asks only for a slight adjustment in the direction of decency. In a world that often seems to operate on the assumption that self-improvement must be total or it is worthless, this modest suggestion is quietly revolutionary. It restores the idea that incremental progress is real progress, that being a little nicer today than yesterday is a legitimate ethical accomplishment.

Why, then, do these words continue to resonate? Perhaps because they acknowledge something that motivational speakers rarely admit: that many of us know roughly who we are, and that knowledge is neither entirely comforting nor entirely tragic. We are not blank slates waiting to be molded by sufficient effort and willpower. We have temperaments, histories, limitations, and blind spots that are not easily erased. Yet we also possess the capacity, however modest, to influence our own behavior in the direction of greater kindness. The quote’s enduring appeal lies in its refusal of grandiosity combined with its insistence on the possibility of change. It is a philosophy for those of us who are not going to become perfect but who might, with intention and effort, become slightly better versions of ourselves. In an age of extremes—of total self-acceptance on one hand and aggressive self-optimization on the other—”Don’t be yourself—be someone a little nicer” offers a sane middle path. It is neither revolutionary nor defeatist. It is, in the truest sense, humanistic: it accepts human limitation while affirming human capacity. It suggests that the moral life is not a matter of grand transformation but of small, daily choices to be a little kinder than we might naturally be. For a quote that originated in anonymous circulation more than sixty years ago, that remains a message worth preserving.