VERIFIED
“How, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible the rulers themselves, but failing that the rest of the city?”
- Commonly attributed to: Plato
- Actual source: Plato, Republic, Book 3, 414b-c (c. 375 BC), Socrates speaking; the familiar English wording is Paul Shorey’s Loeb Classical Library translation (1930)
- Earliest verified appearance: c. 375 BC — Plato, Republic 3.414b-c; in Paul Shorey’s 1930 translation: "How, then… might we contrive one of those opportune falsehoods of which we were just now speaking… so as by one noble lie to persuade if possible the rulers themselves, but failing that the rest of the city?" — read Republic 414c in Shorey’s translation at the Perseus Digital Library
- Confidence: High · Last verified: July 2026
The verdict: Plato really wrote it — the "noble lie" passage is Republic Book 3, 414b-c (c. 375 BC), and this exact English wording is Paul Shorey’s 1930 Loeb translation, verifiable at the Perseus Digital Library.
Every claim above links to a primary source I checked myself. How I verify quotes →
In Plato’s foundational work, The Republic, he constructs an ideal city called Kallipolis. He designs this city to embody perfect justice. However, to maintain this utopia, Plato introduces a startling concept. He proposes a foundational myth, a deliberate untruth told to the citizens for the collective good. This idea, known as the “Noble Lie,” forces us to ask a difficult question about “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin” in ancient philosophy. Can a lie ever be a tool for justice? Exploring this paradox reveals deep insights into the timeless tension between truth, power, and social order.
The Myth of the Metals
The Noble Lie, or gennaion pseudos, is not a simple falsehood. Instead, it is a carefully crafted foundational story with two distinct parts. Plato outlines this myth in Book III of The Republic. He suggests telling citizens that their upbringing and education were merely a dream. In reality, he proposes, the earth formed and nurtured them deep within its soil. This makes them siblings, born from the same motherland. Consequently, they should defend their land and fellow citizens as family. Understanding “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin” helps us grasp Plato’s reasoning for this foundational narrative.
Plato’s Republic and the Noble Lie
This first part fosters a powerful sense of unity and patriotism. The second part, however, establishes a rigid social hierarchy. The myth continues by explaining that the god who fashioned them mixed different metals into their souls. Those destined to rule possess gold in their souls. The auxiliaries, or soldiers, possess silver. Finally, the farmers and craftsmen contain bronze or iron. This myth of the metals justifies a three-tiered class system. It convinces citizens that their social position is natural and divinely ordained, not the result of human design.
A Foundation for Stability
Why would Plato, a philosopher devoted to truth, advocate for such a grand deception? His primary goal was the stability and harmony of the state. He believed that internal conflict, particularly class warfare, posed the greatest threat to any city. The Noble Lie directly addresses this threat. It encourages citizens to accept their roles without envy or resentment. A farmer with a bronze soul would not seek to rule, because he understands his nature is best suited for production. The phrase “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin” encapsulates Plato’s practical approach to maintaining this system.
Furthermore, the myth promotes social cohesion. By framing all citizens as children of the earth, it creates a profound bond that transcends class distinctions. This shared identity motivates them to work together for the city’s welfare. Plato argues that this lie, while false in its literal details, serves a higher truth: the preservation of a just and orderly society. Therefore, the rulers tell this lie not for personal gain but for the benefit of everyone under their care. It is a tool of statecraft, designed to align individual desires with the common good. When we examine “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin,” we uncover Plato’s belief that rulers must choose between philosophical truth and practical governance.
How, then, might we contrive one noble lie to persuade
Ethical Objections and Criticisms
The concept of a state-sanctioned lie is deeply unsettling. It clashes directly with the Socratic ideal of the examined life, which is central to Plato’s own philosophy. How can a society built on a falsehood ever be truly just? This contradiction has attracted criticism for centuries. Critics argue that the Noble Lie infantilizes citizens. It denies them the ability to consent to their governance based on reason and truth. Instead, it manipulates them through myth and emotion. The very question “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin” reveals the profound tension between Plato’s respect for truth and his advocacy for beneficial deception.
Philosopher Karl Popper famously identified the Noble Lie as a key element of Plato’s totalitarian tendencies. Popper saw Kallipolis not as a utopia but as a rigid, closed society where individual freedom is sacrificed for state control. The lie becomes a means of perpetuating an unchangeable social order, which is the antithesis of a dynamic, open society.
Modern Relevance and Interpretation
Is the Noble Lie merely an ancient thought experiment, or does it resonate today? Many scholars argue it provides a lens for examining modern politics. Nations often rely on their own foundational myths. These stories about heroic founders or a unique national destiny serve a similar purpose to Plato’s myth. They foster unity and a shared sense of identity. While not always literal falsehoods, these narratives often simplify and romanticize history.
The Noble Lie’s Impact on Political Philosophy Today
Additionally, the concept forces us to consider the role of “pious frauds” in public life. Governments sometimes present information selectively or create specific narratives to guide public opinion, especially during crises or war. They justify these actions by claiming they serve the national interest or prevent widespread panic. Plato’s work challenges us to question when, if ever, such deceptions are acceptable. It pushes us to define the line between responsible governance and unacceptable manipulation. Understanding “how, then, might we contrive… one noble lie to persuade if possible quote origin” remains vital to this modern debate. The debate over the Noble Lie is, ultimately, a debate about the kind of society we want to live in—one that prioritizes absolute truth or one that values stability, even at the cost of a comforting falsehood.
Explore More About Plato
If you’re interested in learning more about Plato and their impact on history, here are some recommended resources:
- The Big Book of Plato Quotes
- Plato of Athens: A Life in Philosophy
- Plato and the Tyrant: The Fall of Greece’s Greatest Dynasty and the Making of a Philosophic Masterpiece
- Plato: The Man and His Work (Dover Books on Western Philosophy)
- Plato’s “Republic”: A Biography
- The Last Days of Socrates: Euthyphro; Apology; Crito; Phaedo (Penguin Classics)
- Plato: A Very Short Introduction
- Plato: A Civic Life (Great Lives of the Ancient World)
- Plato, A Passionate Thinker (Motivational Reading Series for Children)
- PLATO: The Man Who Drew the Line (The Questioners)
- Antiquity’s Greatest Philosophers: Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle
- To Hell and Back: An Autobiography
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.