I Do Not Know What I Think Until I Read What I’m Writing

“I Do Not Know What I Think Until I Read What I’m Writing”

Explore More About Flannery O’Connor

If you’re interested in learning more about Flannery O’Connor and their impact on history, here are some recommended resources:

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Unveiling Thoughts Through Writing

Writers often find themselves in a paradoxical situation. Most people assume that thoughts precede writing. However, many writers discover their true thoughts only while putting pen to paper. The concept that “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” captures this intriguing idea that has captivated writers for decades, suggesting that writing functions not just as a tool for recording thoughts but as a means of uncovering them.

I Do Not Know What I Think Until I Read What I’m Quote Origin

The notion manifests in two primary expressions: “I write to find out what I think” and “I don’t know what I think until I read what I write.” Both highlight writing as an exploratory tool, not merely as a transcription of pre-formed ideas. Understanding the “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” helps us appreciate how writers use language to discover meaning.

The Literary Origins

In 1948, Southern Gothic writer Flannery O’Connor shared this concept in a letter to her literary agent. She explained her method of writing without a detailed outline, needing to write to discover her story’s direction. O’Connor referenced an older tradition, indicating that the roots of this idea extend beyond her own use. Her articulation of the “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” became one of the most recognizable expressions of this creative principle.

The concept dates back to the 1920s, with educator Graham Wallas attributing a similar sentiment to a young girl. Novelist E.M. Forster also echoed this thought, both focusing initially on spoken rather than written expression. Writing, however, offers unique advantages for thought development. Its permanence allows writers to reflect and revise, unlike spoken words.

Writing as Discovery

By the late 1940s, this idea permeated various creative fields. In 1959, actress Inger Stevens discussed her personal writing practice as a way to discover her thoughts. This concept expanded beyond professional writing to personal journaling. The principle behind “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” resonated with creators across all disciplines.

Understanding the Deeper Meaning Behind This Wisdom

Journalist August Heckscher, in 1963, admitted that he uncovered his thoughts by reading what he had written the day before. This was significant for an editorial writer, as their role typically requires pre-formed opinions. Heckscher’s experience demonstrated how writers at all levels benefit from the practice of discovering thoughts through written words.

Economist Paul Samuelson, in 1969, described writing as a risky intellectual endeavor. He mused that writing forecasts revealed his thoughts, emphasizing the gap between writing and understanding. This gap illustrates why writers embrace the notion that “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin”—the act of writing itself generates clarity.

Mid-Century Literary Adoption

In the 1970s, writers like Joan Didion and E.L. Doctorow expressed similar sentiments. Didion, in her essay “Why I Write,” expanded the concept to include observation and desire. Doctorow noted that writing revealed not only his thoughts but the nature of his work itself. Both authors reinforced the fundamental truth that writing serves as discovery.

Screenwriter John Gregory Dunne acknowledged the saying’s long lineage, describing writers as working by instinct without explicit understanding of their projects. Dunne recognized how writers across generations have relied on this creative principle.

How This Quote Transforms Your Writing Process

Misattributions and Expansions

The phrase has often been misattributed to figures like William Faulkner, despite lacking documentation during his lifetime. Instead, Flannery O’Connor likely originated the “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” through her documented use in letters and interviews.

Playwrights like Edward Albee and Wendy Wasserstein also resonated with this idea. They used writing to explore and understand their thoughts, with Albee describing plays emerging in his mind long before being written. These creators understood that the writing process itself generates understanding.

Conclusion: A Writer’s Journey

This sentiment, shared across decades and disciplines, highlights a universal truth about the creative process. Writing serves not merely to record thoughts but to generate and clarify them. It acts as both a mirror and a catalyst, allowing writers to explore and understand their ideas.

Flannery O’Connor’s articulation of this process in 1948 serves as an early documented example within the writing community. Her insight, echoed by many, underscores writing as a vital tool for discovery and comprehension, revealing thoughts that remain hidden until writers express them through words. The enduring relevance of the “i do not know what i think until i read what im quote origin” demonstrates how essential this principle remains to creative work today.