Writing Is the Hardest Art to Learn

“Publishing, being a business, offers the most objective conditions for teaching and for evaluating how successfully the trainee is learning his job; editing, too, less sharply defined but seeking to be a profession, offers some opportunities for knowing whether one is learning one’s trade; but writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring to the unique, is the most difficult of all to learn.”

Explore More About Morris Philipson

If you’re interested in learning more about Morris Philipson and their impact on history, here are some recommended resources:

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Every writer understands the struggle captured in these lines. This famous observation about “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin” perfectly articulates the elusive nature of literary creation. Unlike a standard trade where you can measure proficiency with objective metrics, writing exists in a gray area that constantly shifts between technical skill and artistic expression.

A fascinating mystery surrounds this insight, however. Most literary enthusiasts confidently attribute these words to Jacques Barzun, the celebrated historian and cultural critic. You will find his name attached to this quote on countless websites and in numerous speeches.

Writing at Least a Craft Origin

Yet history tells a different story. Jacques Barzun did not write this sentence. Instead, Morris Philipson deserves the credit for this wisdom about “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin.” This case of mistaken identity reveals much about how we consume information and highlights the often-overlooked relationship between an author and their editor.

The Roots of the Misattribution

To understand how this confusion began, we must look at the physical book itself. The quote appears in a collection of essays titled On Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Jacques Barzun is the primary author listed on the cover, which leads most readers to assume he wrote every word contained between the bindings.

However, this assumption ignores the structural nuances of publishing. Morris Philipson served as Director of The University of Chicago Press during that era. He contributed the foreword to Barzun’s collection, where he offered this insightful perspective on “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin.” Specifically, Philipson wrote this comparison in the opening pages of both the 1971 first edition and the 1986 second edition.

Readers often skip the fine print in forewords. When someone discovers a brilliant passage in a book credited to Barzun, they naturally ascribe the words to him. Over time, this error compounded. Quotation databases scraped the text, ignored the specific context of the foreword, and solidified the connection to Barzun instead of properly attributing the insight about “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin” to its true source.

Analyzing the Wisdom: Craft vs. Business

Philipson’s observation resonates because it highlights a fundamental truth about creative work. He juxtaposes writing against publishing and editing, noting that publishing operates as a business with a clear bottom line. You can measure success through sales, distribution numbers, and profit margins, so a trainee in publishing knows if they are succeeding because the data tells them so.

Aspiring to the Unique Art Form

Editing sits in the middle ground. Described as “less sharply defined” by Philipson, it seeks professional status with standards for grammar, style, and structure. An editor can learn these rules and thus gauge their progress, even if the metrics are softer than in pure business.

Writing, however, stands alone in its difficulty. The concept of “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin” captures this distinction perfectly. Philipson argues that writing aspires “to the unique,” which is the crux of the challenge. You can master the craft—grammar, syntax, vocabulary—but the art requires something unteachable. A writer must create something that has never existed before, and there is no checklist for soul or voice. Consequently, learning to write remains an endless, often solitary journey without a clear finish line.

Echoes in the Cultural Conversation

Interestingly, Philipson was not the only thinker in the mid-20th century to use this specific framing about art and craft. The distinction permeated the cultural dialogue of the 1960s, with creative professionals across various fields grappling with the same dichotomy.

For example, actor George Peppard expressed a strikingly similar sentiment regarding his own profession. In a 1964 interview with The Christian Science Monitor, Peppard noted that acting is a craft at its least and an art at its best. He emphasized that charm alone could no longer sustain a career and argued instead that actors needed deep knowledge of their trade.

This parallel suggests a broader zeitgeist during the period. Intellectuals and artists sought to legitimize their creative struggles and define the boundary where technical skill ends and true artistry begins. Philipson applied this lens to literature through his famous reflection on “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin,” while others applied it to performance and different creative endeavors.

Why This Writing Quote Still Matters

The Importance of Correct Attribution

Why does it matter who wrote the sentence? After all, the wisdom remains valid regardless of the author’s identity. Nevertheless, accuracy is the bedrock of non-fiction and scholarship. When we erase Morris Philipson’s name, we lose the context of his perspective and diminish the insight’s true power.

Philipson wrote from the viewpoint of a publisher observing the entire ecosystem. He wasn’t simply a writer complaining about difficulty. As an industry leader analyzing the machinery of book production, he understood the business side (publishing), the refinement process (editing), and raw creation (writing).

His background gives additional weight to the quotation about “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin.” He admits that his own side of the industry (business) is easier to learn than the writer’s task. This represents a profound concession, for usually business figures claim their work is the hardest. Philipson, however, humbly bows to the difficulty of the artist’s struggle.

Conclusion

The profound statement regarding “writing, at least a craft and at its best an art, aspiring quote origin” serves as both a warning and a badge of honor for writers. It acknowledges that the path is arduous and the destination undefined, capturing something essential about the creative act.

We owe it to Morris Philipson to credit him for this insight. While Jacques Barzun contributed immensely to the world of letters, this specific gem belongs to his editor and publisher. As we continue to share this quote in writing circles and workshops, let us correct the record. By doing so, we respect the very craft of writing that Philipson so eloquently described.