> “Who will take responsibility for raising the next generation?”
> — Ruth Bader Ginsburg
[image: A candid overhead shot of multiple generations gathered around a rustic wooden dining table during golden hour, with warm sunlight streaming through nearby windows. In the center, a young mother gently guides her toddler’s hands while an elderly grandmother watches with a tender smile from across the table. A father figure leans in attentively, while school-age children sit between the adults, creating a natural circle of family connection. The scene captures authentic intergenerational bonding through soft, natural lighting that highlights the gentle touches and caring gestures between family members. Shallow depth of field focuses on the clasped hands of different ages meeting in the middle, with blurred silhouettes of other family members in the background. The warm, golden-toned photograph emphasizes the organic flow of wisdom and care passing between generations in an intimate, unposed moment of everyday family life.]
Ruth Bader Ginsburg posed this question during a pivotal moment in American legal history. Her words challenged conventional thinking about parenting, gender roles, and societal obligations. The question emerged from her work as an advocate for gender equality and women’s rights.
Ginsburg spoke these words during oral arguments before the Supreme Court in 1971. She represented the plaintiff in a groundbreaking sex discrimination case. The question wasn’t rhetorical—it demanded an answer from a society that placed childcare responsibilities almost exclusively on women.
The early 1970s marked a transformative period for women’s rights in America. Ginsburg worked as a law professor and director of the Women’s Rights Project at the ACLU. She strategically selected cases to challenge laws that treated men and women differently.
During this era, societal expectations dictated strict gender roles. Source Women bore primary responsibility for raising children while men focused on careers. . Furthermore, courts routinely upheld laws that reinforced these traditional roles.
Ginsburg understood that changing these norms required more than legislation. It demanded a fundamental shift in how society viewed parenting and family responsibilities. Her question cut to the heart of this issue.
The quote emerged during Ginsburg’s advocacy work in the early 1970s. She used this question in various forms during legal arguments and public speeches. However, the exact date and location of its first utterance remain somewhat unclear.
Ginsburg frequently raised this question when discussing gender discrimination cases. She highlighted how laws assumed women would always be available for childcare. Meanwhile, these same laws rarely expected men to share these responsibilities equally.
The question gained prominence as Ginsburg’s reputation grew. She argued six cases before the Supreme Court during the 1970s. In each case, she challenged assumptions about gender roles and family obligations.
[image: A candid moment captured in warm afternoon sunlight streaming through a kitchen window, showing a diverse multi-generational family scene where traditional roles are reversed – a father in casual clothes bottle-feeding an infant while a toddler plays with wooden blocks at his feet, a grandmother in modern athletic wear helping an older child with a science experiment at the kitchen counter, and a young mother in professional business attire visible in the background gathering her briefcase and laptop. The composition emphasizes the natural interaction and shared caregiving, with soft golden hour lighting creating an authentic, unposed domestic atmosphere. Kitchen details include fresh vegetables on the counter, children’s artwork hung with magnets on the refrigerator, and scattered toys suggesting an actively lived-in family space. The photography style features shallow depth of field, natural color grading with warm tones, and the genuine, imperfect moments characteristic of real social media lifestyle photography.]
Ginsburg’s question resonated differently across decades. Initially, it challenged legal frameworks that discriminated against women. Over time, it evolved into a broader discussion about work-life balance and parental leave.
In the 1980s and 1990s, advocates used this question to support family leave legislation. They argued that both parents should have opportunities to care for children. Consequently, this helped shift the conversation from “women’s issues” to “family issues.”
Modern interpretations have expanded the question’s scope even further. Today, people apply it to discussions about education funding, childcare accessibility, and social support systems. The question now encompasses community responsibility, not just individual parental duties.
Several variations of this quote circulate online and in publications. Some sources phrase it as “Who will be responsible for raising the next generation?” Others attribute similar sentiments to different speakers entirely.
One common variation asks, “Who will raise our children?” This shorter version loses some of Ginsburg’s original emphasis on responsibility. Nevertheless, it captures the essential concern about childcare and societal obligations.
Occasionally, people misattribute the quote to other feminist leaders or activists. However, the phrasing and context clearly link it to Ginsburg’s legal work. Her specific focus on shared responsibility distinguishes this quote from similar statements by others.
[image: A candid overhead shot of diverse hands coming together in a circle, each hand belonging to different people of varying ages and skin tones, positioned around a small child’s hands in the center. The scene is captured on a warm wooden floor with natural window light streaming across, creating soft shadows. The composition shows adults and elderly individuals’ hands gently reaching toward or supporting the smaller child’s hands, symbolizing intergenerational care and collective support. The lighting is golden hour soft, giving the image an intimate, documentary-style feel typical of authentic social media photography. Some hands wear simple jewelry or watches, adding realistic human details. The focus is sharp on the hands in the center with a subtle depth of field blur on the outer edges, shot from directly above in a flat lay style that’s popular on Instagram.]
Ginsburg’s question fundamentally challenged American legal and social structures. It forced courts to confront their assumptions about gender and parenting. Moreover, it provided a framework for discussing equality in family responsibilities.
The impact extended beyond courtrooms into workplaces and homes. Employers began reconsidering policies that assumed only mothers needed parental leave. Additionally, fathers started advocating for their right to participate actively in childcare.
This question also influenced international conversations about family policy. Countries with progressive parental leave policies often cite similar reasoning. They recognize that raising children benefits from shared responsibility between parents and society.
Ginsburg offered many other observations about gender equality and family responsibilities. She famously said, “Women belong in all places where decisions are being made.” This complements her question about raising the next generation.
Another related quote addresses work-life balance directly. Ginsburg noted that her husband Marty was “the only young man I dated who cared that I had a brain.” Their partnership modeled shared responsibility in both career and family.
Other advocates have expressed similar sentiments. Gloria Steinem emphasized that “women can’t be equal outside the home until men are equal in it.” This echoes Ginsburg’s concern about shared childcare responsibilities.
This question perfectly encapsulates Ginsburg’s approach to gender equality. She believed true equality required changing expectations for both men and women. Therefore, she challenged laws that restricted either gender’s opportunities or responsibilities.
Ginsburg’s personal life demonstrated these values. Her marriage to Marty Ginsburg featured genuine partnership and shared responsibilities. He supported her career ambitions while actively participating in parenting and household duties.
Furthermore, Ginsburg recognized that gender discrimination harmed everyone. Her legal strategy often involved male plaintiffs who faced discrimination due to gender stereotypes. This approach highlighted how rigid gender roles limited opportunities for all people.
[image: A candid documentary-style photograph capturing a diverse group of adults and children gathered in a sunlit community park during golden hour, showing people of various genders actively engaged in childcare and mentoring activities together. In the foreground, a father cradles a toddler while sitting cross-legged on a blanket, nearby a woman in business attire helps a young boy with a soccer ball, and in the middle ground, two people of different genders push children on swings side by side. The background shows more mixed groups of caregivers and kids playing on playground equipment, with warm afternoon sunlight filtering through tree branches creating dappled shadows on the grass. The composition emphasizes natural interaction and shared responsibility, shot with shallow depth of field on a mirrorless camera with authentic color grading that captures the genuine, unposed moments of modern community parenting and intergenerational connection.]
Today, Ginsburg’s question resonates in discussions about paid family leave. Advocates argue that both parents need time to bond with children. Consequently, many companies now offer parental leave to all parents, regardless of gender.
The question also applies to conversations about affordable childcare. Communities debate who bears responsibility for ensuring families have access to quality care. Some argue this is a societal obligation, not just an individual family concern.
Educators and policymakers invoke this question when discussing early childhood education. They recognize that investing in children’s development benefits entire communities. Therefore, many advocate for universal pre-K programs and expanded childcare subsidies.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought renewed attention to Ginsburg’s question. School closures forced many families to confront childcare challenges directly. Meanwhile, workplaces struggled to accommodate employees’ caregiving responsibilities.
Ginsburg’s question remains strikingly relevant decades after she first posed it. Modern families still grapple with balancing work and childcare responsibilities. Additionally, societal structures often fail to support parents adequately.
The question now extends to discussions about climate change and environmental stewardship. People ask who will ensure a livable planet for future generations. This broader interpretation maintains Ginsburg’s emphasis on collective responsibility.
Workplace policies continue evolving in response to this fundamental question. Remote work options and flexible schedules acknowledge that employees have caregiving responsibilities. However, significant gaps remain in support for working parents.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s question about raising the next generation transcends its original legal context. It challenges every generation to examine how society supports families and children. Moreover, it reminds us that childcare isn’t solely a private family matter.
The question’s power lies in its simplicity and universality. Every society must answer it somehow. The quality of that answer determines opportunities available to both children and parents.
As we continue grappling with work-life balance and family support systems, Ginsburg’s question guides us. It demands we consider whether our policies and practices truly support the next generation. Furthermore, it asks whether we’re willing to share responsibility for raising healthy, educated, and supported children.
Ginsburg’s legacy includes not just her judicial opinions but also the questions she posed. This particular question continues challenging us to build a more equitable society. One where raising the next generation is a shared responsibility, not a burden placed disproportionately on any single group.
Explore More About Ruth Bader Ginsburg
If you found this quote inspiring, you might enjoy these products related to Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Doll – 12″ Soft Stuffed Plush Little Thinker – $24.95
- Bleacher Creatures Ruth Bader Ginsburg 10″ Plush Figure- The RBG Icon for Play or Display – $24.99
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Magnetic Personality – Plush Finger Puppet and Refrigerator Magnet, Approx 4″ Tall – $9.95
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift, Women Belong In All Places Where Decisions Are Being Made, Plaque with Wooden Stand, Wood Sign Plaque Gift, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, RBG Woman’s Rights B1 – $7.99
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift – RBG Woman’s Rights, Wood Sign Gift with Stand – $9.99
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.