The landscape of social justice and equality has undergone tremendous transformation over the past several decades, yet certain obstacles remain persistently difficult to overcome. Among these challenges, the phenomenon of implicit prejudices—those deeply embedded attitudes and stereotypes that operate beneath our conscious awareness—stands out as particularly formidable. These hidden biases shape our perceptions, influence our decisions, and affect our interactions with others in ways we rarely recognize or acknowledge. The complexity of addressing these unconscious mental frameworks has been a subject of extensive discussion among legal scholars, civil rights advocates, and social scientists alike.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose distinguished career as a Supreme Court Justice and pioneering advocate for gender equality spanned more than half a century, recognized the profound difficulty inherent in confronting these invisible prejudices. Her observation that unconscious bias represents one of the most challenging aspects of discrimination to address speaks to a sophisticated understanding of how inequality perpetuates itself through mechanisms that operate beyond our immediate awareness. This insight reflects not merely an academic observation but rather the culmination of decades spent working within legal systems, challenging discriminatory practices, and witnessing firsthand how subtle prejudices can undermine even well-intentioned efforts toward equality.
The concept of unconscious bias has become increasingly prominent in contemporary discourse across multiple domains, including education, employment, healthcare, criminal justice, and corporate governance. This terminology encompasses the automatic, unintentional prejudices that individuals harbor without deliberate thought or conscious recognition. These biases emerge from the human brain’s natural tendency to categorize information quickly, relying on cultural conditioning, past experiences, and societal messaging to form rapid judgments about people and situations. While this cognitive shortcut serves evolutionary purposes—allowing humans to process vast amounts of information efficiently—it simultaneously creates fertile ground for stereotypes and discriminatory patterns to take root and flourish.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg emerged as a transformative figure during an era when discrimination manifested in far more explicit and legally sanctioned forms. When she began her legal career, gender-based discrimination was not merely tolerated but often codified in law. Women faced systematic barriers to employment, education, credit access, and legal rights. Through her groundbreaking work, Ginsburg recognized that even as overt discrimination became socially unacceptable and legally prohibited, more subtle forms of prejudice would persist, operating beneath the surface of conscious thought and deliberate action.
Her advocacy extended beyond challenging explicit discriminatory statutes to illuminating the ways in which unconscious attitudes and assumptions perpetuate inequality. This represented a more nuanced and sophisticated approach to civil rights work, acknowledging that legal victories alone could not dismantle the deeply ingrained mental frameworks that sustain discriminatory outcomes. By drawing attention to these hidden prejudices, Ginsburg pushed for a more comprehensive understanding of how discrimination operates and what strategies might effectively counteract it.
During her tenure at the ACLU Women’s Rights Project in the 1970s, Ginsburg developed legal strategies that would fundamentally reshape constitutional law regarding gender equality. This period of her career laid the essential groundwork for her later reflections on unconscious bias. Through litigating cases that challenged gender-based classifications in law, she witnessed how deeply embedded assumptions about men’s and women’s roles influenced judicial reasoning, legislative decision-making, and social policy. These experiences informed her understanding that changing laws represented only one component of achieving genuine equality—transforming underlying attitudes and unconscious assumptions would prove equally critical yet considerably more difficult.
While the precise moment when Ruth Bader Ginsburg articulated her observation about the difficulty of addressing unconscious bias remains somewhat elusive, the sentiment undoubtedly emerged from her extensive experience as both a litigator and jurist. As a Supreme Court Justice, she regularly engaged with complex questions surrounding equality, discrimination, and justice through her judicial opinions, public speeches, interviews, and academic writings. Her platform provided numerous opportunities to share insights gained from decades of work in civil rights advocacy and constitutional interpretation.
The statement reflects a mature understanding developed over a lifetime of confronting discrimination in its various manifestations. Early in her career, Ginsburg focused primarily on dismantling explicit legal barriers that treated men and women differently under the law. Through strategic litigation, she successfully argued multiple cases before the Supreme Court, establishing important precedents that extended equal protection principles to gender-based classifications. However, as legal frameworks evolved and overt discrimination became less acceptable, she recognized that achieving substantive equality would require addressing the more insidious forms of bias that operate automatically and unconsciously.
This observation likely crystallized through her experiences on the bench, where she witnessed how unconscious assumptions could influence judicial reasoning and legal outcomes. Even well-meaning judges, lawyers, and policymakers could harbor implicit biases that shaped their interpretation of facts, evaluation of credibility, and application of legal principles. Recognizing these patterns, Ginsburg understood that confronting unconscious bias required sustained attention, deliberate effort, and institutional changes designed to counteract automatic prejudices.
The statement also reflects broader developments in psychological research during the latter decades of the twentieth century. Scientists began documenting the existence and effects of implicit biases through experimental methods, demonstrating that people could simultaneously hold egalitarian conscious beliefs while harboring unconscious prejudices that influenced their behavior. This research provided empirical support for what Ginsburg had observed through her legal work: that eliminating discrimination required more than changing explicit attitudes or formal policies—it demanded addressing the automatic associations and unconscious frameworks that operate beneath conscious awareness.
Ginsburg’s insight about the difficulty of addressing unconscious bias has proven remarkably prescient, gaining increased relevance as organizations and institutions grapple with persistent inequality despite formal commitments to diversity and inclusion. Her words have become a touchstone in contemporary discussions about workplace equity, educational access, criminal justice reform, and healthcare disparities. The quote resonates because it acknowledges a fundamental truth that many people experience: despite genuine intentions to treat others fairly, unconscious prejudices can undermine those efforts in subtle yet consequential ways.
In corporate and organizational contexts, the recognition of unconscious bias has led to widespread adoption of training programs designed to raise awareness about implicit prejudices and their effects. These initiatives seek to help individuals recognize their own biases, understand how these mental frameworks influence decision-making, and develop strategies to counteract automatic prejudices. Organizations implement such training in hiring processes, promotion decisions, performance evaluations, and team dynamics, aiming to create more equitable environments where talent and merit determine outcomes rather than unconscious stereotypes.
Academic institutions have similarly embraced discussions of unconscious bias, incorporating these concepts into educational curricula, faculty development programs, and institutional policies. Research papers examining implicit prejudice appear across multiple disciplines, from psychology and sociology to education and public health. Scholars investigate how unconscious biases affect student-teacher interactions, academic advising, admissions decisions, and research funding allocation. This body of work builds upon the foundation that advocates like Ginsburg established, demonstrating the pervasive nature of implicit prejudices and their significant consequences.
Social justice movements have adopted Ginsburg’s observation as a rallying point for continued advocacy and reform. Activists recognize that achieving equality requires sustained attention to both explicit discrimination and the more subtle forms of bias that operate unconsciously. This understanding has informed campaigns addressing racial profiling, gender-based violence, LGBTQ+ rights, disability accommodations, and numerous other equality issues. The acknowledgment that unconscious bias is “one of the hardest things to get at” validates the ongoing nature of civil rights work, explaining why progress sometimes feels frustratingly slow despite genuine commitments to equality.
As with many memorable observations from prominent figures, Ginsburg’s statement about unconscious bias has been repeated, paraphrased, and sometimes slightly altered as it circulates through various contexts. Some versions simplify the wording while others expand upon it, but the essential message remains consistent: addressing implicit prejudices represents a particularly challenging aspect of combating discrimination. These variations reflect the quote’s adaptability to different audiences and contexts while maintaining its core insight.
Occasionally, similar sentiments about the difficulty of confronting unconscious bias are mistakenly attributed to other prominent figures in civil rights, psychology, or social justice. This pattern of misattribution underscores the universality of the observation—multiple thinkers and advocates have recognized the same fundamental challenge. The confusion also reflects how certain ideas become part of collective discourse, transcending individual authorship to represent shared understanding within movements and communities.
Other leaders and scholars have articulated complementary perspectives that reinforce Ginsburg’s insight. Mahzarin Banaji, a distinguished psychologist whose research has fundamentally shaped understanding of implicit bias, has extensively documented how these unconscious prejudices pervade daily life and influence countless decisions. Her work, along with that of Anthony Greenwald, developed the Implicit Association Test, which provides empirical measurement of automatic associations that operate beneath conscious awareness. This research demonstrates scientifically what Ginsburg observed through legal practice: that people can simultaneously hold egalitarian conscious values while harboring unconscious prejudices that contradict those stated beliefs.
Sheryl Sandberg, in her influential book *Lean In*, emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and actively counteracting bias in professional environments. Her discussions of how unconscious stereotypes about gender affect workplace dynamics, advancement opportunities, and leadership perceptions echo Ginsburg’s understanding that implicit prejudices require deliberate attention and sustained effort to address. Sandberg’s work brings these insights into corporate contexts, demonstrating how unconscious bias operates in hiring decisions, performance evaluations, and organizational culture.
Numerous other thinkers have contributed to this conversation, each adding nuance and depth to understanding how unconscious bias functions and how it might be addressed. Legal scholars have examined how implicit prejudices affect judicial decision-making, jury deliberations, and sentencing outcomes. Educators have investigated how teacher expectations shaped by unconscious stereotypes influence student achievement and educational trajectories. Healthcare researchers have documented how implicit biases contribute to disparities in treatment recommendations, pain management, and health outcomes across different demographic groups.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s observation about unconscious bias reflects her broader philosophical commitment to equality, justice, and the rule of law. Throughout her distinguished career, she demonstrated unwavering dedication to dismantling barriers that prevented individuals from achieving their full potential based on arbitrary characteristics rather than merit or ability. Her approach to civil rights advocacy combined strategic pragmatism with principled idealism, recognizing both the necessity of incremental progress and the importance of maintaining a vision of comprehensive equality.
Her understanding of unconscious bias highlights a sophisticated and nuanced approach to combating discrimination. Rather than viewing prejudice as merely a matter of conscious animus or deliberate malice, Ginsburg recognized that inequality perpetuates itself through complex mechanisms, including automatic mental processes that operate without awareness or intention. This insight demanded more comprehensive strategies for achieving equality—strategies that addressed not only explicit discrimination but also the subtle, unconscious frameworks that shape perceptions, decisions, and behaviors.
Throughout her tenure on the Supreme Court, which began with her appointment in 1993 and continued until her death in 2020, Ginsburg consistently applied this understanding to her judicial work. Her opinions and dissents often illuminated how unconscious assumptions and stereotypes influenced legal reasoning and perpetuated inequality. She challenged her colleagues to examine their own implicit frameworks and consider how automatic associations might affect their interpretation of constitutional principles and evaluation of evidence.
Ginsburg’s commitment to addressing discrimination at both conscious and unconscious levels reflected her understanding that achieving genuine equality requires transformation at multiple levels: legal frameworks, institutional practices, social norms, and individual cognition. She recognized that while changing laws represented crucial progress, sustainable equality demanded deeper cultural shifts that would alter the unconscious mental frameworks through which people perceive and interact with others.
In contemporary society, Ginsburg’s observation about the difficulty of addressing unconscious bias serves as both validation and challenge. It validates the experiences of those who have worked diligently toward equality yet encountered persistent disparities that cannot be explained by explicit discrimination alone. Simultaneously, it challenges individuals, organizations, and institutions to maintain vigilance and dedication in confronting implicit prejudices, recognizing that this work requires sustained effort rather than one-time interventions.
Organizations across sectors have developed various approaches to addressing unconscious bias, with varying degrees of success. Training programs aim to raise awareness about implicit prejudices, helping participants recognize how automatic associations might influence their decisions and behaviors. These initiatives typically combine education about the psychological mechanisms underlying unconscious bias with practical strategies for counteracting its effects. However, research on the effectiveness of such training remains mixed, with some studies suggesting that awareness alone may be insufficient to produce lasting behavioral change.
More comprehensive approaches recognize that addressing unconscious bias requires systemic interventions that go beyond individual awareness. These strategies include structured decision-making processes that reduce opportunities for implicit prejudices to influence outcomes, diverse representation in leadership and decision-making roles, regular auditing of outcomes to identify disparities that might reflect unconscious bias, and organizational cultures that encourage open discussion of bias and its effects. The United Kingdom government has published assessments examining the evidence for effectiveness of unconscious bias training, noting both its potential value and limitations.
Educational institutions have similarly grappled with how to address unconscious bias in teaching, advising, admissions, and institutional culture. The U.S. Department of Education has published materials examining gender equity in education, recognizing how implicit stereotypes can affect educational opportunities and outcomes. These efforts acknowledge that creating genuinely equitable educational environments requires attention to the subtle ways unconscious biases shape teacher expectations, classroom interactions, academic advising, and institutional policies.
The criminal justice system represents another domain where unconscious bias has profound consequences. Research demonstrates that implicit prejudices can influence decisions at every stage of the justice system, from initial police encounters through sentencing and parole determinations. Addressing these biases requires comprehensive reforms that include training, policy changes, increased diversity, enhanced accountability mechanisms, and systemic restructuring to reduce opportunities for unconscious prejudices to affect outcomes.
Healthcare represents yet another critical area where unconscious bias contributes to significant disparities. Studies document how implicit prejudices affect diagnostic decisions, treatment recommendations, pain management, and patient-provider communication, contributing to worse health outcomes for marginalized groups. Addressing these biases requires medical education that includes training on implicit prejudice, institutional policies that promote equitable care, and systems for monitoring outcomes to identify disparities that might reflect unconscious bias.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recognition that unconscious bias represents “one of the hardest things to get at” continues to shape contemporary approaches to equality and justice. Her observation provides a framework for understanding why progress toward genuine equality sometimes feels frustratingly slow despite formal legal protections and stated commitments to fairness. By acknowledging the difficulty of addressing implicit prejudices, she validated the ongoing nature of civil rights work while challenging future generations to maintain dedication to this complex task.
The Supreme Court Historical Society has documented Ginsburg’s profound impact on constitutional law and civil rights, noting her transformative influence on legal protections against discrimination. Her legacy extends beyond specific legal victories to include this broader understanding of how inequality perpetuates itself through unconscious mechanisms. This insight has shaped how subsequent generations of lawyers, judges, policymakers, educators, and advocates approach questions of discrimination and equality.
Moving forward, addressing unconscious bias will require continued attention at multiple levels. Individual awareness remains important, but insufficient alone. Institutional practices must be designed to counteract the influence of implicit prejudices through structured processes, diverse representation, regular outcome monitoring, and cultures that encourage open discussion of bias. Legal frameworks must continue evolving to address not only explicit discrimination but also practices and policies that perpetuate inequality through their interaction with unconscious prejudices. Research must continue documenting how implicit biases operate across different contexts and evaluating which interventions most effectively counteract their influence.
Ginsburg’s observation reminds us that achieving equality is not a destination reached through a single set of reforms but rather an ongoing process requiring sustained commitment, continuous learning, and persistent effort. The difficulty of addressing unconscious bias should not discourage action but rather inspire more comprehensive, creative, and sustained approaches to creating genuinely equitable societies. Her words challenge each generation to examine not only explicit discriminatory practices but also the subtle, automatic frameworks that shape perceptions and decisions beneath conscious awareness.
In conclusion, Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s insight about the profound difficulty of addressing unconscious bias represents a significant contribution to ongoing conversations about equality, justice, and social progress. Her acknowledgment of these hidden prejudices demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of how discrimination operates through mechanisms that extend beyond conscious awareness or deliberate intention. This observation challenges individuals, organizations, and institutions to look deeper, question automatic assumptions, and maintain vigilant dedication to creating more just and equitable societies. As contemporary society continues grappling with persistent inequalities despite formal commitments to fairness, Ginsburg’s words provide both explanation and inspiration—acknowledging the genuine difficulty of this work while affirming its absolute necessity. Her legacy includes not only specific legal victories but also this broader framework for understanding how equality must be pursued at multiple levels, including the challenging realm of unconscious mental processes that shape human perception and behavior in subtle yet consequential ways.
Explore More About Ruth Bader Ginsburg
If you found this quote inspiring, you might enjoy these products related to Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Doll – 12″ Soft Stuffed Plush Little Thinker – $24.95
- Bleacher Creatures Ruth Bader Ginsburg 10″ Plush Figure- The RBG Icon for Play or Display – $24.99
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Magnetic Personality – Plush Finger Puppet and Refrigerator Magnet, Approx 4″ Tall – $9.95
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift, Women Belong In All Places Where Decisions Are Being Made, Plaque with Wooden Stand, Wood Sign Plaque Gift, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, RBG Woman’s Rights B1 – $7.99
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift – RBG Woman’s Rights, Wood Sign Gift with Stand – $9.99
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.