I cannot promise you a life of sunshine; I cannot promise riches, wealth, or gold; I cannot promise you an easy pathway That leads away from change or growing old. But I can promise all my heart’s devotion; A smile to chase away your tears of sorrow; A love that’s ever true and ever growing; A hand to hold in yours through each tomorrow. Source
This poem resonates deeply at weddings and romantic occasions. Many people attribute its simple, heartfelt words to the legendary American author, Mark Twain. However, the true story behind this beloved verse is far more mysterious. In fact, the evidence shows it is impossible for Twain to have written it.
The Unraveling of a Literary Myth
The most compelling piece of evidence is a simple matter of timing. Samuel Clemens, known as Mark Twain Biography – National Park Service, died in 1910. Yet, this poem did not appear in print until many decades later. Researchers have scoured Twain’s extensive writings, letters, and speeches. They found no trace of this poem or any similar phrasing. The timeline simply does not add up.
This chronological gap is the first major clue. It suggests the poem’s origins lie elsewhere, far from the pen of the celebrated humorist. Therefore, we must look to a more recent history to find its source.
. Mark Twain – National Park Service
A Humble Beginning
The poem’s documented journey begins on December 21, 1971. It first appeared in the classifieds section of New Jersey’s Vineland Times Journal. The piece was not presented as a famous work. Instead, it was an intimate message signed, “Love, S.” This suggests the sender was sharing a personal sentiment, perhaps from a greeting card or another anonymous source. The true author remained unknown from the very start. Source
This initial appearance was humble and anonymous. It lacked any connection to famous authors. Furthermore, it established that the poem was in circulation by the early 1970s, a full 61 years after Twain’s death.
A Poem That Changes with Time
Like a folk song, the poem evolved as more people shared it. Different versions began to appear in various publications. For example, a Louisiana newspaper published a modified version in 1980. The paper credited a ninth-grade student, Margo T. Brandt, with authorship. This version changed some wording, using “can’t” instead of “cannot” and adding other small tweaks. It also included lines specific to Valentine’s Day, showing how people adapted the verse for different occasions.
Later, in 1997, another newspaper featured a variant credited to someone named Kimber Crocker. These shifting attributions and textual changes highlight a work in flux. Its authorship was fluid, and its words were not set in stone. The poem belonged to the people who shared it, each adding their own small mark. This organic evolution is common for anonymous works that capture the public’s imagination. Mark Twain Papers & Project – University of California, Berkeley
How Did Mark Twain Get the Credit?
The false attribution to Mark Twain appears to be a relatively recent development. The connection likely solidified around 2004. A book titled “Poems and Readings for Weddings” published an eight-line version of the poem. It incorrectly listed Mark Twain as the author. Interestingly, a similar compilation from 2003 had listed the very same poem as “anonymous.”. Source
This shows how quickly a misattribution can take hold. Once printed in a book, the false credit gained an air of authority. Subsequently, people began sharing the poem online and in ceremonies with Twain’s name attached. The idea was romantic. Attributing the simple, profound words to a literary giant gave them added weight and prestige. The myth was more appealing than the anonymous reality, which is why it has persisted for so long.
In summary, this beautiful poem does not belong to Mark Twain Project – University of California, Berkeley. It is a piece of modern folk poetry with unknown origins. Its power comes not from a famous name but from its honest, heartfelt message of love and commitment. It reminds us that love isn’t about promising perfection. Instead, it is about promising to be there, hand in hand, for every tomorrow.