This simple, seven-word sentence from Jane Austen’s Emma captures a profound human truth. On the surface, it seems almost childishly obvious. Of course, we prefer our own things, our own people, our own ideas. However, Austen, a master of social observation, embeds deep psychological and social commentary within this seemingly unremarkable line. The statement serves as a key to understanding not only her characters but also the inherent biases that shape our daily lives. It reveals how our preferences are rarely objective. Instead, they are deeply intertwined with our sense of self.
The Psychology Behind the Preference
Modern psychology provides a framework for Austen’s observation. Source This innate favoritism is not just a simple choice; it is a product of powerful cognitive biases. One such bias is the endowment effect. Researchers have repeatedly shown that people place a higher value on an object they own than on an identical one they do not. This feeling of ownership extends beyond physical items to our opinions, creations, and even our communities. We like our own ideas best because they are ours.
Furthermore, confirmation bias plays a significant role. We actively seek out and interpret information that confirms our existing beliefs. Therefore, we naturally favor our own choices because we filter reality to support them. This creates a self-reinforcing loop of preference. Our favorite team is the best because we focus on their victories. Our political views are correct because we consume media that validates them. Austen intuitively understood this tendency long before scientists formally named these biases. Her characters consistently demonstrate this flawed, yet deeply human, way of thinking.
A Mirror to Regency Society
In Austen’s novels, this principle drives much of the drama and comedy. The quote originates with Mrs. Elton in Emma, a character known for her vanity and social climbing. Her insistence that her brother-in-law’s estate is superior to all others is a perfect example. She doesn’t judge based on objective merit. Instead, she judges based on personal connection. Her