Quote Origin: “Throwing out preclearance when it has…

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

> “Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered these powerful words in 2013. They appear in her famous dissenting opinion for the Supreme Court case *Shelby County v. Holder*. This case fundamentally changed the landscape of American voting rights. The quote uses a simple, accessible metaphor to explain a complex legal concept. Specifically, Ginsburg defended the Voting Rights Act of 1965 against those who wished to dismantle it. She argued that the law worked effectively. Therefore, removing it was a dangerous mistake.

Her words quickly resonated beyond the courtroom. Legal scholars and activists alike seized upon the imagery. It perfectly captured the logic of preventative laws. If a safety measure prevents a disaster, the absence of disaster proves the measure’s value. It does not prove the measure is unnecessary. This article explores the history, meaning, and lasting impact of this iconic quote.

To understand the quote, we must first look at history. Congress passed the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 1965. This landmark legislation aimed to stop racial discrimination in voting. Before this law, many states used poll taxes and literacy tests. Consequently, African Americans struggled to register to vote in the South. The VRA changed this dynamic by enforcing constitutional rights.

A powerful overhead shot of diverse hands from different skin tones reaching toward the center of a

Section 5 served as the heart of the VRA. It required certain states to get federal approval before changing voting laws. We call this process “preclearance.” These states had documented histories of discrimination. The federal government had to ensure new laws were fair before they took effect. Essentially, preclearance acted as a shield. It stopped discriminatory laws before they could harm voters.

Over the decades, Congress renewed the Act multiple times. Each time, they found that discrimination still existed. Thus, the protections remained necessary. The “umbrella” of federal oversight kept voters dry. It protected them from the “rain” of disenfranchisement. This system worked well for nearly fifty years.

The Supreme Court heard *Shelby County v. Holder* in 2013. Shelby County, Alabama, challenged the constitutionality of the VRA. They argued that the country had changed significantly since 1965. Therefore, the federal oversight was no longer necessary. The conservative majority on the Court agreed with this assessment. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

Roberts stated that the coverage formula was outdated. He believed it relied on old data. Consequently, the Court struck down Section 4(b) of the Act. This effectively turned off the preclearance requirement. The majority believed that minority voter turnout had improved enough to warrant this change. They argued the “emergency” conditions of 1965 no longer applied.

However, Justice Ginsburg strongly disagreed. She wrote a dissent that became legendary. In this dissent, she argued that the VRA was still vital. She believed discrimination still existed, just in new forms. Therefore, the protections remained necessary. This sharp disagreement led directly to the famous umbrella metaphor. She wanted to illustrate the logical fallacy in the majority’s reasoning.

Ginsburg’s metaphor is brilliant in its simplicity. Imagine standing in a heavy rainstorm. You hold an umbrella over your head. Because of the umbrella, you stay dry. You might think, “I am not getting wet, so I do not need this umbrella.” This line of thinking is obviously flawed.

A dramatic outdoor scene captured during a heavy rainstorm, showing a person’s hand releasing

If you throw the umbrella away, you will immediately get soaked. The umbrella caused the dryness. Similarly, the VRA caused the decrease in voter discrimination. The Court argued that low discrimination rates proved the law was unnecessary. Conversely, Ginsburg argued those low rates proved the law worked. Removing the law removed the protection.

This logic applies to many safety regulations. For example, we do not remove traffic lights just because accidents are low at an intersection. The lights create the safety. Removing them invites chaos. Ginsburg used this relatable image to critique the Court’s abstract legal reasoning. She wanted the public to understand the real-world stakes.

Unfortunately, Ginsburg’s warning proved prophetic. The Court’s decision removed federal oversight. As a result, states changed their voting laws rapidly. Within hours of the ruling, Texas announced strict new voter ID laws. Other states followed suit quickly. They closed polling places and purged voter rolls.

North Carolina passed a comprehensive voting bill shortly after the ruling. Source A federal court later struck down this law. The court stated that the law targeted African Americans with “almost surgical precision.” This event validated Ginsburg’s fears. The “rain” of discrimination returned once the “umbrella” vanished.

Activists used the quote to rally support. It appeared on protest signs and social media. The metaphor helped ordinary citizens understand technical legal changes. It turned a dry court case into a tangible issue. People realized that their protections were gone. Consequently, a new wave of voting rights activism emerged.

This dissent helped cement Ginsburg’s status as a pop culture icon. The internet quickly embraced the “Notorious RBG” persona. Young people shared the umbrella quote widely on Tumblr and Twitter. It appeared on t-shirts, mugs, and tote bags. The quote became a symbol of resistance.

A powerful photograph captured in dramatic natural lighting shows a solitary figure standing defiant

Previously, Supreme Court justices rarely achieved celebrity status. Ginsburg changed that. Her clear, forceful writing appealed to a younger generation. They saw her as a defender of civil rights. The umbrella quote played a massive role in this perception. It showed her wit and her ability to cut through nonsense.

Moreover, the quote reflects her broader judicial philosophy. Ginsburg believed in looking at real-world conditions. She did not interpret the Constitution in a vacuum. She considered how laws affected actual people. The umbrella metaphor is a perfect example of this pragmatism. It prioritizes practical reality over theoretical purity.

Today, the quote remains highly relevant. Voting rights advocates frequently cite it. They use it to argue for restoring the VRA. Congress has introduced bills to update the preclearance formula. These efforts often face strong political opposition. Nevertheless, the umbrella metaphor continues to frame the debate.

Scholars study the quote as a masterclass in legal writing. It demonstrates how to communicate effectively with the public. Judges often write in dense, technical language. In contrast, Ginsburg used clear, relatable imagery. She wanted citizens to understand the stakes. She succeeded in making the law accessible.

Furthermore, the quote applies to other areas of law. We see similar arguments regarding environmental regulations and public health. When regulations work, problems disappear. Critics then argue the regulations are useless. Ginsburg’s logic reminds us to value prevention. We must appreciate the invisible work that safety measures perform.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg left a lasting mark on American law. Her “umbrella” quote stands as one of her most enduring statements. It captures the essence of preventative justice. We build protections to stop bad things from happening. When those protections work, we must not discard them. Instead, we should maintain them.

The metaphor serves as a warning and a lesson. It warns us about the dangers of complacency. It teaches us to value the laws that keep us safe. As debates over voting rights continue, her words echo loudly. We are still in the storm. We still need the umbrella. Ultimately, Ginsburg’s legacy inspires us to keep holding it up.

Explore More About Ruth Bader Ginsburg

If you found this quote inspiring, you might enjoy these products related to Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Topics: