The United States Constitution stands as a remarkable testament to the vision and foresight of those who crafted it more than two centuries ago. Among the many powerful elements contained within this foundational document, perhaps none resonates more profoundly with citizens and legal scholars alike than the opening declaration that establishes the source of governmental authority. This phrase has been referenced countless times by jurists, politicians, historians, and ordinary Americans seeking to understand the true nature of their democracy. One notable figure who frequently emphasized the significance of these opening words was Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the pioneering Supreme Court Justice whose career exemplified dedication to constitutional principles and equal justice under law.
Justice Ginsburg often drew attention to a remarkable fact about America’s governing charter: it represents the oldest written constitution that remains in active use anywhere in the world. This extraordinary longevity speaks volumes about the document’s adaptability, wisdom, and fundamental soundness. What makes this achievement even more remarkable is that the Constitution begins with a simple yet revolutionary declaration consisting of just three words that establish the ultimate source of governmental legitimacy and power. These words proclaim that authority derives not from monarchs, aristocrats, or divine right, but from the collective will of the citizenry themselves.
To fully appreciate the significance of the Constitution’s opening declaration, we must transport ourselves back to the tumultuous period of its creation. The year 1787 marked a critical juncture in American history, coming just a few short years after the successful conclusion of the Revolutionary War that had secured independence from British rule. The newly independent states found themselves facing unprecedented challenges as they attempted to govern themselves under the Articles of Confederation, a document that had proven woefully inadequate for the task of binding together thirteen separate entities into a cohesive nation.
The Articles of Confederation, adopted during the Revolutionary War, had created a loose association of sovereign states with a weak central government that lacked the authority to levy taxes, regulate commerce effectively, or enforce its limited powers. This governmental structure reflected the colonists’ deep suspicion of centralized authority, born from their bitter experience under British rule. However, the practical realities of governing an emerging nation soon revealed the critical flaws in this decentralized approach. Economic chaos threatened as states erected trade barriers against one another, issued competing currencies, and pursued contradictory foreign policies. The federal government found itself unable to pay its debts, defend its borders adequately, or command respect from foreign powers.
These mounting crises led to the convening of the Philadelphia Convention in the summer of 1787, where delegates from twelve states (Rhode Island notably refused to participate) gathered to address the deficiencies of the existing governmental framework. What began as an effort to revise the Articles of Confederation quickly evolved into something far more ambitious: the creation of an entirely new constitutional structure that would fundamentally reshape American governance. The Founding Fathers who assembled in Philadelphia faced the monumental challenge of designing a system that would provide sufficient federal authority to address national concerns while simultaneously preserving the liberty and autonomy that Americans had fought so hard to secure.
The delegates who gathered in Philadelphia represented some of the most brilliant political minds of their generation. George Washington presided over the proceedings, lending his immense prestige to the endeavor. James Madison, often called the “Father of the Constitution,” arrived prepared with extensive research on historical governments and detailed proposals for the new framework. Benjamin Franklin, though elderly and in declining health, contributed his wisdom and diplomatic skills to facilitate compromise. Alexander Hamilton advocated forcefully for a strong central government, while others like George Mason championed the protection of individual rights. Through hot summer months of intense debate, negotiation, and compromise, these men hammered out a document that would prove remarkably durable and adaptable.
The opening section of the Constitution, known as the Preamble, serves a function far more significant than mere introduction or preamble in the conventional sense. This carefully crafted statement establishes the philosophical foundation upon which the entire constitutional structure rests. The Preamble articulates both the source of governmental authority and the purposes for which that government exists. By beginning with the declaration that power originates with the people themselves, the Constitution makes an unequivocal statement about the nature of American democracy that was revolutionary for its time and remains powerful today.
The concept of popular sovereignty—the idea that ultimate political authority resides in the citizenry rather than in rulers—represented a dramatic departure from the governmental norms that prevailed throughout most of the world in the eighteenth century. Monarchies, aristocracies, and various forms of authoritarian rule dominated the global landscape. Even in nations with some representative elements, power typically flowed from the top down rather than from the bottom up. The American Constitution boldly asserted a different principle: governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and the people possess the inherent right to establish the form of government they believe will best secure their welfare and liberty.
The Preamble goes on to enumerate six fundamental purposes that justify the establishment of the constitutional government: forming a more perfect union, establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty for present and future generations. These objectives reflect the practical challenges the nation faced under the Articles of Confederation while also articulating timeless aspirations that continue to guide American governance. Each phrase was carefully chosen and debated, representing consensus about the essential functions that a national government must fulfill to serve its citizens effectively.
From the moment of its ratification, the Constitution has served as a living document subject to interpretation, application, and occasional amendment to address changing circumstances and evolving understandings of justice. The opening declaration about popular sovereignty has been invoked countless times throughout American history, often during periods of significant social and political transformation. During debates over the expansion of voting rights, civil rights struggles, and controversies about the proper scope of governmental authority, Americans have returned repeatedly to these foundational words to ground their arguments in constitutional principles.
The nineteenth century witnessed numerous invocations of the Constitution’s democratic foundations during fierce debates over slavery, states’ rights, and the nature of the Union itself. Abraham Lincoln, in his immortal Gettysburg Address delivered in 1863 during the midst of the Civil War, echoed the Constitution’s emphasis on popular governance when he described the conflict as a test of whether a nation “conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal” could long endure. Lincoln’s vision of “government of the people, by the people, for the people” represented a restatement and expansion of the constitutional principle that ultimate authority resides in the citizenry. His words helped reframe the Civil War not merely as a struggle to preserve the Union, but as a fight to ensure that democratic self-governance would not perish from the earth.
The twentieth century brought new challenges and new interpretations of constitutional principles. The Progressive Era saw reformers invoke the Constitution’s democratic ideals to argue for expanded voting rights, including women’s suffrage achieved through the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s drew heavily on constitutional principles to challenge segregation and discrimination, arguing that a government truly of, by, and for all the people could not legitimately exclude significant portions of the population from full participation in civic life. Legal victories like Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 and legislative achievements like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 represented efforts to align American practice more closely with constitutional ideals.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s distinguished career as a lawyer, advocate, and Supreme Court Justice exemplified deep commitment to the constitutional principle that governmental authority derives from all the people, not merely from privileged segments of society. Before her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993, Ginsburg had already established herself as one of the nation’s leading advocates for gender equality under law. As director of the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union during the 1970s, she argued six landmark cases before the Supreme Court, winning five of them. Her strategic litigation approach sought to demonstrate that laws treating men and women differently often violated constitutional principles of equal protection.
Ginsburg’s judicial philosophy reflected her understanding that the Constitution’s promise of governance by “the people” necessarily encompassed all citizens regardless of gender, race, religion, or other characteristics. She frequently emphasized that the Constitution must be interpreted as a living document capable of addressing circumstances and recognizing forms of equality that the Framers themselves might not have fully contemplated. This interpretive approach did not, in her view, represent abandonment of constitutional principles but rather faithful adherence to the document’s core commitment to justice and equal treatment under law.
Throughout her tenure on the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg authored numerous opinions that expanded protections for women’s rights, workers’ rights, and other marginalized groups. Her dissenting opinions, particularly in cases where she believed the majority had failed to adequately protect constitutional rights, became legendary for their forceful reasoning and eloquent defense of equality principles. Admirers began referring to her as “The Notorious RBG,” a playful reference to rapper Notorious B.I.G. that reflected her status as a cultural icon and champion of justice. Even in her eighties, Ginsburg continued serving on the Court with remarkable dedication, viewing her judicial work as essential to ensuring that constitutional protections extended to all Americans.
Justice Ginsburg’s frequent references to the Constitution’s opening words and its status as the world’s oldest functioning written constitution reflected her deep appreciation for the document’s enduring relevance. She understood that the Constitution’s longevity resulted not from rigid inflexibility but from its capacity to accommodate changing social understandings while remaining anchored to fundamental principles of democratic governance and individual liberty. Her career demonstrated how constitutional principles, properly understood and applied, could serve as powerful tools for expanding justice and inclusion rather than as barriers to social progress.
The fact that the United States Constitution represents the oldest written constitution still in force carries significance that extends far beyond American borders. When the Constitution was drafted and ratified in the late 1780s, written constitutions were virtually unknown. Most nations operated under unwritten constitutional traditions, collections of laws and precedents that had evolved over centuries, or under systems where governmental authority derived from sources other than explicit popular consent. The American experiment in creating a written framework that established governmental structures, allocated powers, and protected individual rights represented a bold innovation that would eventually inspire constitutional movements worldwide.
Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, nations emerging from colonial rule, overthrowing authoritarian regimes, or seeking to establish more democratic governance frequently looked to the American Constitution as a model and source of inspiration. While few countries adopted the American constitutional structure in its entirety—many opted for parliamentary rather than presidential systems, for example—the fundamental principles embodied in the Constitution influenced constitutional development globally. The concept of popular sovereignty, the idea of limited government with enumerated powers, the protection of individual rights through constitutional guarantees, and the establishment of judicial review all became common features of modern constitutional democracies, traceable in significant part to American constitutional influence.
The Constitution’s longevity also provides valuable lessons about constitutional design and maintenance. Many constitutions drafted in the decades and centuries following American independence proved short-lived, replaced repeatedly as governments changed or social conditions evolved. The American Constitution’s survival through civil war, economic transformations, territorial expansion, demographic changes, and technological revolutions that the Framers could never have imagined demonstrates the value of creating frameworks that establish clear principles while allowing sufficient flexibility for adaptation. The amendment process, though deliberately difficult to prevent hasty or ill-considered changes, has permitted the Constitution to evolve in response to changing social understandings and needs. Twenty-seven amendments have been ratified since the Constitution’s adoption, addressing issues ranging from the abolition of slavery to presidential term limits to voting rights expansions.
In the twenty-first century, the Constitution’s opening declaration continues to resonate in debates about the proper role of government, the scope of individual rights, and the meaning of democratic governance. Contemporary movements advocating for various causes—from campaign finance reform to voting rights protection to environmental regulation—frequently invoke constitutional principles to support their positions. The assertion that government derives its authority from the people serves as a powerful rhetorical and legal foundation for arguments about governmental accountability, transparency, and responsiveness to citizen concerns.
Modern constitutional interpretation continues to grapple with questions about how to apply eighteenth-century principles to twenty-first-century circumstances. Debates about privacy rights in the digital age, the scope of executive authority in times of national security threats, the regulation of new forms of communication and commerce, and the balance between federal and state authority in addressing national challenges all require courts, legislators, and citizens to consider what constitutional principles demand in contexts the Framers could not have anticipated. These debates often return to fundamental questions about the Constitution’s purposes and the nature of the democratic compact it establishes.
The principle of popular sovereignty embodied in the Constitution’s opening words also raises ongoing questions about who counts as “the people” and how their will should be expressed and implemented. Debates about voting rights, campaign finance, redistricting, and electoral systems all implicate fundamental questions about democratic participation and representation. Concerns about declining civic participation, polarization, and the influence of money in politics have prompted renewed attention to whether contemporary American governance lives up to the constitutional ideal of government by the people. These discussions reflect the Constitution’s continuing vitality as a framework for national self-examination and aspiration rather than merely a historical artifact.
The Constitution’s role in American civic education cannot be overstated. Generations of students have been taught about the document’s structure, principles, and historical context as part of their introduction to American government and citizenship. The opening words of the Preamble, including the declaration about popular sovereignty, are often among the first constitutional phrases that students memorize and contemplate. This educational emphasis reflects a recognition that sustaining democratic self-governance requires citizens who understand the constitutional foundations of their political system and their own role within it.
Beyond formal education, the Constitution occupies a central place in American civic culture and national identity. The original document is preserved and displayed at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., where millions of visitors come to view it each year. Constitution Day, celebrated annually on September 17th (the anniversary of the document’s signing), provides an occasion for reflection on constitutional principles and their contemporary application. Legal and historical scholars continue to produce voluminous literature analyzing every aspect of the Constitution’s drafting, ratification, interpretation, and evolution, ensuring that each generation can engage with this foundational text in increasingly sophisticated ways.
The Constitution’s opening declaration serves as a perpetual reminder that American democracy depends on active citizenship rather than passive acceptance of governmental authority. By establishing that power flows from the people, the Constitution implies corresponding responsibilities for citizens to participate in governance, hold leaders accountable, and work to ensure that governmental actions serve the common good. This civic dimension of constitutional principles helps explain why debates about constitutional interpretation often generate such passion—they are not merely academic exercises but disputes about the fundamental nature of American democracy and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.
More than two centuries after its drafting, the United States Constitution continues to serve as the foundational framework for American governance, a testament to the wisdom and foresight of those who created it. The document’s remarkable longevity as the world’s oldest functioning written constitution reflects both its sound structural design and its capacity to accommodate changing circumstances while remaining anchored to core principles. The opening declaration establishing popular sovereignty remains as relevant and powerful today as when it was first written, continuing to inspire citizens, guide legal interpretation, and shape national debates about the proper role of government in a democratic society.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s frequent emphasis on the Constitution’s opening words and its status as the world’s oldest written constitution in force reflected her deep understanding of its significance. Her career demonstrated how constitutional principles, properly understood and vigorously defended, could serve as powerful tools for expanding justice and ensuring that government truly represents all the people rather than merely privileged segments of society. Her legacy, like that of the Constitution itself, reminds us that democratic self-governance requires constant vigilance, active participation, and unwavering commitment to the principles of equality and justice under law.
As Americans continue to grapple with contemporary challenges and debates about the nation’s future direction, they would do well to return regularly to the Constitution’s foundational principles. The assertion that governmental authority derives from the people themselves carries profound implications for how citizens should engage with their democracy, how leaders should exercise power, and how the nation should address the inevitable tensions between competing values and interests. The Constitution’s enduring power lies not merely in its status as supreme law but in its capacity to inspire ongoing efforts to form a more perfect union, establish justice, and secure the blessings of liberty for all Americans.
Explore More About Ruth Bader Ginsburg
If you found this quote inspiring, you might enjoy these products related to Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Doll – 12″ Soft Stuffed Plush Little Thinker – $24.95
- Bleacher Creatures Ruth Bader Ginsburg 10″ Plush Figure- The RBG Icon for Play or Display – $24.99
- The Unemployed Philosophers Guild Ruth Bader Ginsburg Magnetic Personality – Plush Finger Puppet and Refrigerator Magnet, Approx 4″ Tall – $9.95
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift, Women Belong In All Places Where Decisions Are Being Made, Plaque with Wooden Stand, Wood Sign Plaque Gift, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, RBG Woman’s Rights B1 – $7.99
- Feminist Wood Plaque Gift – RBG Woman’s Rights, Wood Sign Gift with Stand – $9.99
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.