“Laws are like spiders’ webs, which catch the small flies, but are broken by the wasps and hornets.”
This powerful analogy has echoed through centuries. It captures a timeless frustration with justice. The words paint a vivid picture of a legal system that ensnares the weak. Meanwhile, the powerful and wealthy tear through it without consequence. While often attributed to the Athenian statesman Solon, the philosopher Plutarch amplified its message. He used it to explore the nature of power, law, and inequality in the ancient world. His analysis provides a critical lens on the enduring struggle for fair governance.
Understanding this quote requires looking at the man who chronicled it. It also means examining the turbulent times he lived in. Plutarch’s critique of power was not just an abstract thought. It was a direct response to the world he observed.
Who Was Plutarch? A Bridge Between Worlds
Plutarch was a Greek historian, biographer, and essayist. He lived from approximately 46 to 120 AD. Importantly, he lived during the height of the Roman Empire. As a Greek intellectual under Roman rule, he had a unique perspective. He could appreciate the cultural achievements of his Hellenic ancestors. He also understood the immense power wielded by Rome. This dual viewpoint deeply informed his writing, especially his famous work, Parallel Lives.
In Parallel Lives, Plutarch pairs famous Greeks with famous Romans. For example, he compares the Greek orator Demosthenes to the Roman orator Cicero. This method allowed him to explore universal virtues and vices. He analyzed how character influenced leadership and the fate of nations. He was less a historian of events and more a biographer of character. Consequently, he focused on the moral lessons one could draw from the past. His work constantly questioned the ethics of power and the responsibilities of those who hold it.
Plutarch was not a revolutionary. He was a member of the elite and served as a priest at the Temple of Apollo in Delphi. However, his writings reveal a deep concern for justice and social order. He believed that the stability of the state depended on a fair application of the law. When laws only served to protect the powerful, they lost their legitimacy. This belief is the philosophical foundation for his discussion of the spider’s web analogy.
